Ain't gonna work on Jamie's farm no more
At a press conference yesterday (summarized in this AP article), attended by Jesse Jackson, Paul Mooney and Maxine Waters, Laugh Factory owner Jamie Masada said “the comedy club will ban comedians from using all “hateful words” including the “n-word.”
Masada also said “We want to be the first place in the world to ask all of the comedians if they go on stage and use the ‘n-word,’ (it) comes out of their paycheck.”
In this matter, there has been a suspicious lack of any talk of a slippery slope, a deafening silence from the usual defenders of free speech. This is not about the “n-word.” It’s about free expression in general. When Masada broadens his proscription to include “hateful words,” he goes down a road that no one should go down. It is easy to imagine that the language and the work of comedians at the Factory might come under the scope of what amounts to a speech code. His blanket banning of a word (or ill-defined set of words) doesn’t consider context, and it opens up every comedian who might work there to intense scrutiny. It quite possibly might have the effect of shutting them down. And then there is the matter of making them vulnerable to lawsuits or monetary extortion. (Masada himself has gone so far as to lead the charge when it comes to punishing comics who work his room and violate his speech code. What assurances does any comic who works there have that Masada would not throw him or her under the bus should a patron take offense to say, the use of the word “cunt?” Or maybe an attack on Christianity? Or a percieved slight of gay people?) By broadening the ban, Masada has declared open season on the “A-word,” the “B-word”… you get the idea.
If Jesse Jackson can stand next to Masada and declare that the “n-word” is “unprotected” (his exact word!), then who is next in line? Will Katherine MacKinnon exert sufficient pressure on Masada so that the “c-word” is banned (along with any comic who might dare to construct a joke using it)? Will Ralph Reed be sending registered letters to Masada in order to pressure him to ban comics who might offend the sensibilities of evangelicals? Let’s take it to a far-fetched but perfectly logical extreme– Will comics who tread the boards at the Factory be instructed not to say how much they hate cats lest PETA come down too hard on Masada? (If you think that’s implausible note that PETA is trying to banish the term “pet” from the lexicon and replace it with “animal companion.” In effect paving the way for legislation against any/all “animal ownership.”) It seems like only yesterday that there were police detectives in Philadelphia and San Francisco taking notes during Lenny Bruce’s shows. We can easily see a return to such an oppressive atmosphere
There’s nothing wrong with having a club where all comics are expected to work “clean.” It’s been done, with varying degrees of success, over the years. But his latest public utterances leave the door wide open to abuse. His latest warnings are so vague, so imprecise, that they should give any comic pause before they mount the stage at 8001 Sunset Blvd. In mishandling this situation, Masada has taken an isolated incident and extrapolated it over the entire comedy community. In doing so, he has done all comics a disservice. He has proven that he does not have our best interests in mind. Why would any comic want to work under those conditions?
Why, in this case, does everyone have traction on this particular slope? Where are all the comedians defending their right to say anything they want to say? Where are all the comics– who make their living with words– expressing alarm at an encroachment on their freedoms?
To paraphrase Masada, we want to be the first place in the world to ask all of the comedians to shun the Laugh Factory.
This is an ideal opporunity for all other comedy clubs to step up and declare their venues “free speech zones.”
No Responses
Reply to: Ain't gonna work on Jamie's farm no more







I’m with you I wrote a blog about this samething yesterday and the idea of of this makes me alittle sick.
Your invocation of Lenny Bruce is right on in this situation. He certainly couldn’t do his “teaching LBJ to say negro” bit under these rules.
Masada won’t be the first to fine comics for using offensive language, anyhow — Giggles, an agency in FL, has it in their contract that comics are fined per use of the n-word, mf, and (I believe) the c-word. But this whole thing is just seriously, sadly ridiculous.
Andrea Dworkin is dead, but as long as you can dredge up the feminist boogeyman little details like that don’t matter right (great journalism!)?
Cringe Humor will gladly support this cause. Masada was all for free speech with the Club Soda Kenny incident that happened at his NYC venue, but now that civil action is involved he’s turning into a spineless jellyfishSo I guess comedians talking about raping women & molesting their children is better than using the N WordUnbelievable
Pointdexterism writes:“Andrea Dworkin is dead, but as long as you can dredge up the feminist boogeyman little details like that don’t matter right (great journalism!)?”Okay, shitbag, let’s change it to Catharine McKinnon. Happy? She’s quite alive, last time I checked.Now– see if you can focus on the real issues involved.
Shitbag?Let’s see…shitbag, shitbag, shitbag…oh, yes. Here it is. Shitbag – $32.50. Make the check payable to Jamie Masada…that’s M-A-S-A-D-A…
For the record, I think “shitbag” is a funny word. Also for the record, if you have to pay to use a word — even an N-word — it’s not a fine against the performer. It’s a royalty for Jamie Masada.And, anyway you slice it, there is a word for people who make money off the plight of African-Americans. And, no, it’s not “BET.”
Excellent point, B.o.W.! Sounds like a fine-turned-royalty is not the best way to honor the cause. A comedian’s job is to be funny, so if they’re not funny they should not get work at the establishment. That should be the law of the clubs. And don’t pee on stage.
The Laff Factory is no longer a Comedy Club, it’s a Humor Building. It’s become a social club where like-minded people can get together and watch other like-minded people perform humor. Much like a Nazi officers club or a Klan BBQ. No, it isn’t going to far in order to make a point. Comedy is art. Art is a dynamic, growing, evolving thing. You can’t cut it here and nip it there without retarding it from what it wants to be.*(I’d like to apologize for a few things in my comment above: first off the mis-spelling of the word ‘laugh’ is the club owners and not mine – I meant no insult to dyslexic people. I used the words ‘nip’ and ‘retarding’ – I’ll be sending money to an Asian Rights group and to a near by Special Education Center. Also my reference to evolution – I’d like to apologize to my Christian Fundementalist friends.)That’s comedy.
Brian – Great coverage/opinion writing from you on this issue. One take on this whole thing I’m surprised I haven’t seen. Allred’s making noise about restitution, Masada’s threatening to withhold money from offending comics…but let’s remember how this whole thing started (according to certain reports, anyway) – with a heckle. Well, what if comedians took the same approach that everyone else is, and got all oversensitive and pissed off and hired lawyers? Think a lawyer with some background in employment law could make a case against both a heckler and a club owner who allowed heckling? A heckler makes hostile comments to a comic – isn’t that potentially endangering the comic’s safety? Shouldn’t the club owner have taken steps to ensure that safety? Surely there’s a lawsuit waiting to happen there. That heckler might have a gun – why didn’t the club owner install metal detactors? Or if a patron screams, “you’re not funny” in the middle of an act. Potentially slanderous? Sure, it’s just that person’s opinion, but that doesn’t seem to be stopping a lot of lawyers these days. After all, if it’s screamed out when other customers (potential CD and ticket buyers) and a club owner/booker can hear it, might that not damage a comic’s ability to make additional revenue and get future work? And what of the interruption itself – doesn’t that impinge on a comic’s ability to make a living? I’m just riffing here, but I’m sure an enterprising lawyer – like Gloria Allred – could come up with a sustainable legal case against hecklers and the club owners who allow them to do what they do. What do you say, comics – wanna take this insanity to the next level? Think Masada will stand up for the rights of actual comedians? Food for thought. – Larry
What about “Cracker”, it gets thrown around with the same animosity that the “N” words does? Cracker, Cheezit, Tricuit, who gives a fuck, they are just words!!! The last time I checked we lived in a country where free speech meant something. It’s not like this was said in church, it was at a comedy club, they’re jokes. I say face your demons head on, get over it, and then let’s worry about the real issues affecting our society.
I have mixed feelings about this. There’s no question Masada’s grandstanding, and the whole “fine” thing is ridiculous. But if a club owner tells me not to say “fuck,” I say OK and go out on stage. I certainly don’t feel like my art is threatened. They’re my audience, but it’s his club and his patrons. If he feels his customers will be offended, then why shouldn’t he protect his business?
ChrisO writes:<>“I have mixed feelings about this. There’s no question Masada’s grandstanding, and the whole “fine” thing is ridiculous. But if a club owner tells me not to say “fuck,” I say OK and go out on stage. I certainly don’t feel like my art is threatened. They’re my audience, but it’s his club and his patrons. If he feels his customers will be offended, then why shouldn’t he protect his business?”<>To which we reply:We said as much in our initial post (“There’s nothing wrong with having a club where all comics are expected to work “clean.” It’s been done, with varying degrees of success, over the years. But his latest public utterances leave the door wide open to abuse. His latest warnings are so vague, so imprecise, that they should give any comic pause before they mount the stage at 8001 Sunset Blvd. In mishandling this situation, Masada has taken an isolated incident and extrapolated it over the entire comedy community. In doing so, he has done all comics a disservice. He has proven that he does not have our best interests in mind. Why would any comic want to work under those conditions?” is how we put it.)There is a subtle difference in the way that Masada handled it and how the “Clean Comedy Club” concept has been handled in the past. If we were to open a clean club, we’d advertise it as such and we would offer a deal to potential customers (with the implied consent of the comedians contracted to work there) that we’re going to provide clean comedy that will not offend customers. We take out the ads, open the doors and let the market take care of the rest.Masada steps up to the mike and addresses the media and the public and frames the entire debacle as a “problem” that needs “fixing”– the comedians are irresponsible, I’m going to fine them until they get in line, we’re going to ban certain words, etc.The message sent is not that one individual comic, Michael Richards, screwed up, but that comedians in general are out of control and Masada is going to be the one that brings them back under control.The focus on the entire body of comics and the punitive nature of the solution (rather than a positive, upbeat attempt to market an alternative brand of comedy) is what struck us as oppressive, negative and not at all hospitable to the artists involved.And, in the way of marketing, we suggested that other venues offer the exact opposite of what Masada proposed– Free speech zones.We didn’t call for a boycott. We suggested that comics “shun” the Factory, as it didn’t seem as though Masada played this in a particularly skillful way. And, in doing so, he compounded the negatives from such people as Nikki Finke, Jackson, et al.He appeared to choose sides… and it didn’t seem as though he wasn’t on ours.
I’m pretty sure that last sentence should read “…and it didn’t seem as though he was on ours.”
When I originally told my Mom I’m a stand-up comedian, she said, <>“I hope you’re not using < HREF="http://freedomfactor.blogspot.com/2006/09/bad-words.html" REL="nofollow">bad words<>.”<> I said, <>“There’s no such thing as a bad word. Only bad context.”<>There is nothing inherently evil about <>nigger<>. That’s not to say it’s “just a word.” To the contrary, <>nigger<> is best known as the most hurtful term used by whites against blacks since approximately 1830. <>Nigger’s <>infamy makes it one of our most powerful words. Accordingly, it should be spoken, written about, honored, debated and discussed, but never censored.Finding racism in a word is as easy as it is impossible to see inside the human heart. Censors do not regulate words. They regulate personal conduct. They replace our judgment with their own.Recently, Michael Richards used <>nigger to <>put down some black hecklers. But, < HREF="http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2006/11/29/4754/seinfeld_sales_soar" REL="nofollow"><>Seinfeld sales are up 70%<><>. So, I guess these legions of fans are Pro-Jew and Anti-Black, right?A 1971 episode of <>All in the Family<>, features the following exchange between Biggoted Archie Bunker and Idealist Mike Stivic.Mike: <>The kids all made fun of you, huh?<>Archie: <>Yeah, they all made fun of me. Except for this one little black kid named Winston.<>Mike: <>A black kid liked you?<>Archie: <>No, the black kid beat the hell out of me.<>Mike: <>Why? He must have had a reason.<>Archie: <>Well he said that I said he was a “nigger”.<>Mike: <>Did you?<>Archie: <>Sure. That’s what all them people were called in them days. Everybody we knew called them people niggers. It’s all my old man called’em there. What the hell was I supposed to do? I didn’t know what to call them. I couldn’t call him a Wop. I couldn’t call him Wop, ’cause Wop is what we called the Dagos.<>Norman Lear knew how to use words to inform, criticize and get a laugh.As an American Entrepreneur for a quarter century, a stand-up comedian and proprietor of the only locally-owned, all-comedy venue in San Diego, I find < HREF="http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2006/12/06/4779/black_comic_banned" REL="nofollow"><>The Laugh Factory<><> to be spineless in censoring <>nigger<> from the stage.<>< HREF="http://www.comedycoop.org" REL="nofollow">The San Diego Comedy Co-op<><> will <>never<> censor speech. Stand-up comedy is not Mass. The audience tells you when you’ve gone too far, as it did with Michael Richards. Audiences do a fine job of protecting themselves. The Laugh Factory insults the audience with this preemptive protection. We would have suspended Michael Richards and given him another chance in a couple of months.This blog, the sites for my < HREF="http://www.comedycoop.org" REL="nofollow">comedy theatre<>, my < HREF="http://www.baddad.net" REL="nofollow">one-man show<> and my < HREF="http://www.stand-upcomic.com" REL="nofollow">official stand-up comedy site<> all proudly operate under the slogan: <>Powered by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution<>. But, the next time I take the stage at the Laugh Factory, unless I am willing to pay a fine (which I will happily pay) I cannot express my opinion that Kramer was wrong in the way he said <>nigger<>.How do I criticize the inappropriate use of a word I cannot say? I refuse to say, <>The N Word.<> I’m 47; not four. So, one less thing to talk about, huh? Bury the word. Problem solved.I’m in that Top 1%, Liberal activists enjoy marginalizing. Collectively, we One Percenters pay 50% of the Federal income tax. We own most of the property. We are overwhelmingly white; overwhelmingly male. More than any other group, U.S. society reflects the collective will of “my people” i.e. well-to-do white men.Based on Monday’s oral argument, < HREF="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2006-12-04-scotus-school-race_x.htm" REL="nofollow">the United States Supreme Court seems poised to gut <>Brown v. Board of Education<><>. Regardless of how one comes down on the question of institutionalized racial diversity in the classroom, it is important to note that white folks are the ones leading the charge in this litigation.My wife and I are among the last of the Baby Boomers; a generation perhaps more than any other that was raised on the promise of the American Dream. But, somewhere along the line we Boomers evolved into the generation of internally inconsistent ideologies. We’re the generation of tolerance and zero tolerance. We flee the city for the suburbs. We celebrate diversity with bumper stickers; actually advertising that we prefer to celebrate from afar.Remember a few years back when those two jack-offs shot up that school in Columbine? As a result, today’s parents are asked to sign schools’ so-called <>Zero Tolerance Policies. <>And, they blithely comply.When my sons were in high school, however, this is something I consistently refused to do. I told them my son is not a suspect. I told them if other parents want their children putting their heads on the desk, that’s their choice. I told them I refuse to endorse a policy that sends my son to Juvenile Hall for possession of a sandwich knife.The legislation that ultimately evolved into < HREF="http://www.ussc.gov/" REL="nofollow"><>The Federal Sentencing Guidelines<><> which beginning in 1987, institutionalized Zero Tolerance Sentencing in the Federal system, <>i.e. everyone gets a lot of jail time no matter what<>, was co-sponsored by Ted Kennedy and Joe Biden.These antiseptic Guidelines contain more than 1,000 pages of language like this: <>“To determine a defendant’s offense level, the judge selects the offense guideline that corresponds to the defendant’s conviction, determines the base offense level from that guideline, and adjusts that offense level for specific offense characteristics and special instructions contained in the section.”<>Baby Boomers through their overwhelmingly white, male, Republican and Democrat elected officials have chosen to create and finance a society where the incarceration rate for the black man is 800% greater than that of the white man. Politicians cannot get away with codifying <>nigger<> in the U.S. Code. Instead, they use code words like <>crack<>.As a result, for every three black males born, one will do a < HREF="http://www.famm.org/ExploreSentencing/TheIssue/FacesofFAMM/LamontLawrenceGarrison1.aspx" REL="nofollow">prison stint <>during his lifetime. These men are then relegated to prison factories owned and controlled by a Government owned corporation called <>Federal Prison Industries, Inc.<> <>dba<> < HREF="http://www.unicor.gov/" REL="nofollow"><>UNICOR<><> where year upon year, they are forced to provide slave labor. If you live in a predominently white state and you are wondering where all the black men are, visit the local jail.Upon release from prison the man is placed on so-called <>Supervised Release<>. One condition compels the man to work full-time. Another condition compels the man to tell potential employers he just got out of jail. A third condition returns the man to jail for failure to perform the first two conditions. Read these < HREF="http://www.freedomfactor.org/documents/conditions.pdf" REL="nofollow">conditions<> and ask yourself honestly if <>you<> could abide by them for three-to-five years. If you smoke pot, drink, gamble, associate with someone who’s been to jail, quit a job, get fired or bounce a check, you wouldn’t last long on Supervised Release.As I write, I’m looking at a book on my shelf about the history of the word <>nigger<>; aptly titled < HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Nigger-Strange-Career-Troublesome-Word/dp/0375713719/sr=1-4/qid=1165444982/ref=sr_1_4/105-7772856-1370019?ie=UTF8&s=books" REL="nofollow"><>Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word<><>. More than two generations ago, Agatha Christie wrote a book called < HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Ten-Little-Niggers-Fontana-Books/dp/B000CEL8SW/sr=1-1/qid=1165444982/ref=pd_bbs_1/105-
7772856-1370019?ie=UTF8&s=books" REL="nofollow"><>Ten Little Niggers<><>. There are many < HREF="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/105-4195135-7030049?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=nigger" REL="nofollow">others<>.Shame on Kramer. Shame on the Laugh Factory. Shame on the Zero Tolerance Crowd. When it’s your kid, don’t come crying to me.Copyright 2006 Mark Whitney. All rights reserved.