Defining yourself by what you are not
The article in the Vancouver Straight by Jenny Charlesworth says that Bronx Cheer, the comedy duo of Craig Anderson and Conor Holler, has “been cautioned against labeling their offbeat comedy routines ‘alternative'” by “a bunch of comedians in Toronto.” Why? Because, the Torontonians said, “people won’t think you’re cool.”
Ahhhh… we see. Alternative (at least in Canada) is now un-cool.
Then, there’s this quote:
“When I say I’m a comedian, people conjure up images of the standup [comic] against the brick wall telling standard observational humour,” Holler notes. “I think more recently, though, comedy is not so cut-and-dry-you can do things that are a bit more experimental.”
We’re not sure who these “people” are that automatically think of a brick wall when the word “comedian” comes up.
Perhaps they are journalists.
Like Kerry Gold, who, writing for the Toronto Globe & Mail, describes a local comedy troupe thusly.
They aren’t the comedy troupes of old– there are no middle-aged guys standing against a brick wall with a microphone and opening lines like, “Don’t you hate it when…”
Don’t you hate it when a journalist falls back on tired clichés?
Is Kerry Gold even a real person? (We just wolfed down a quarter pound chunk of Kerry Gold cheddar cheese last week… bought it at Trader Joe’s. It might be our favorite cheese… perhaps tied with Parrano.)
One Response
Reply to: Defining yourself by what you are not
I have worked with many of the biggest names in what is called “alternative” comedy. I have performed on many of the mainstay shows of the “alternative” scene. I have never once heard any of these comics describe themselves or their acts as “alternative” or any other such categorization. They call themselves comedians. Other people make up categories to place them in because they like the feeling of everything being in a labeled box, and it helps them believe that they understand something about art and the creative process, which they do not. We might as well throw away the term because
A. It is meaningless. Describe what it means. You will immediately find ten exceptions to your definition, both within the group you have deemed alternative and outside it.
B. The people who are supposedly doing it are neither setting out to do it or seeing themselves as part of that movement. This is not the case for other movements. Rancid knows they are a punk band. Mastadon is aware that they play metal. Monet was proud to be an impressionist, Thompson a gonzo journalist, etc. Kyle Kinane is not trying to do “alternative comedy” any more than Kurt Cobain set out to play “grunge.”
C. What’s the point? So that we can arrange the comedy albums on our Itunes by “Genre?” What do you get by classifying things? It doesn’t get you any closer to what a comedian is about by feeling able to define him into a group which he never applied to join.