Comedian's passport deemed suspicious
A Continental gate agent flagged the passport of Joan Rivers, citing the comedian’s two names. (Her name is Joan Rosenberg, but she goes by the name Joan Rivers. You may have heard of her. Apparently Continental gate agents aren’t familiar with her.)
Transportation security had a very bad couple of weeks.
But, when you base transportation security on shaky premises and refuse to base it on good, solid logic because it might be “unfair, irrational or degrading” to someone, then you have a situation where Joan Rivers misses her flight.
We know that Rivers hasn’t exactly been burning up the airwaves with television appearances lately, but she’s an icon. Even a Continental gate agent should have known that Joan Rivers couldn’t be a terrorist. Or is the Continental gate agent (and the airline’s policy with regard to security) so totally disconnected from reality that she wasn’t aware that it was absolutely ridiculous to cause Rivers to miss her flight back to New Jersey? Just how concerned are they with appearances that they would hassle a 76-year-old Jewish grandmother from Brooklyn?
The TSA is in worse shape than we can imagine.
She managed to snap off a few classic Rivers lines.
“If I were going to make up an alias, I wouldn’t pick Rosenberg. I’d pick Jolie or Pitt,” said Rivers, back home Monday in New York with her sense of humor intact. “Do terrorists wear Manolo Blahniks? I can tell you Donna Karan does not make anything that hides a bomb,” she said.
Perhaps the gate agent was a history buff… she might have suspected that Rivers was related to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and might therefore be carrying a small atomic bomb in her carry on.
3 Responses
Reply to: Comedian's passport deemed suspicious
Everyone is outraged that some poor security shmuck in COSTA RICA never heard of some washed up comedian?. So she’s not as famous as she thought, big deal. Worse indignities happen to ordinary citizens every day trying to board airplanes for the simple crime of looking middle eastern. You don’t want to hassle with petty officials, stick to ground transportation.
No, Mr. Munky, you are wrong.
First: Not many folks are outraged. Pity, since there should be a whole lot more who are.
Folks are bemused.
Rivers herself doesn’t seem outraged. She should be. Not because someone doesn’t recognize her, but because she doesn’t fit the profile of the folks who are trying to blow up planes.
(And, yes, they do fit a profile. It’s in all the papers. You can look it up.)
Your heart bleeds over the (largely imagined, CAIR-inflated) “worse indignities” suffered by folks whose only crime is “looking middle eastern.” Nice rhetorical flourish. But ultimately a hollow one.
No one has a right to fly. That’s the only thing you get right.
But we should expect the employees of US-based airlines to conduct business with some logic and some common sense. The number of planes hijacked or blown out of the air by 76-year-old Jewish grandmothers is… waitaminute… we have the figure here somewhere… it’s… ZERO.
No one should hassle Joan Rosenberg because she has two different names on her passport. It makes no sense.
BTW: She’s not “washed up.” And she’s probably about as famous as she thinks she is… which is very. Considering that, she’s conducting herself with a tremendous amount of grace. And she’s treating the entire situation with a tremendous… sense of humor. Which is a whole lot more than we can say for you.
There should only have a problem if she had been over-heard talking about the previous nights show, saying “I bombed!”. Or yelling Hi to me from across the terminal.
Jack