Canadian comic sells out colleague
Well, it’s “game on” up in Vancouver. The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal continues to embarrass the entire nation (and most of Western Civilization) by following through on its plan to persecute a comedian, Guy Earle, for dealing with two unruly audience members at a comedy show. It all resumed on Monday and continues through tomorrow.
You can read all about it on the “The Guy Earle Trial,” a blog that details the slow motion rape of free speech in the lower left-hand corner of Canada.
It’s a great blog, with links to media coverage of the incident, a pencil sketch of the courtroom and links to media coverage of the ensuing harassment. It also has transcripts of testimony. We found this chunk of testimony by comedian Nic Roy to be simultaneously fascinating and nauseating:
Roy: They were making out when I was onstage, and that’s pretty much it. I mentioned something about it – don’t recall the detail – but they didn’t get upset. When Guy took the stage, they were making out again and he got angry and then the insults back and forth. It stopped being a comedy show, it got awkward, Guy Earle was just being offensive, he wasn’t being funny. He pretty much acted like Michael Richards, so to speak, but instead of nigger, he used the word dyke. Also asshole, piece of shit, little dick, fuck you, fuck yourself, you’re a piece of shit.
This fellow, this Roy, is a comedian? Offensive? Offensive to whom, Mr. Roy? This piece of garbage is all too eager to suck up to the kangaroo court. We won’t waste the “bold” key when typing his name.
We caught a couple of articles about the trial in the Canadian press. This, from Monday’s CBC article, caught our eye:
He (Earle) told the CBC that trying to stop hecklers can be unpopular, “but it shouldn’t be illegal.”[…]
Some media outlets said Pardy was asking for $20,000 in compensation, but her lawyer told CBC News she was only asking for whatever the tribunal thinks is fair. The hearing began Monday morning in Vancouver and is scheduled to last four days.
The words “tribunal” and “fair” should not be in the same universe, let alone the same sentence.
If you have a particularly strong stomach, you can wade into the swamp that is the Comments after the article. We’re particularly repulsed by this one, from “traci_wpg,” which should make the hair on the back of your neck stand up:
I think it’s about time some of these big mouth comics were held accountable for their mean spirited humour. Whenever a comic deliberately humiliates or makes racist and sexist statements they should be held accountable. Making a case for artistitic freedom or freedom of expression is a pretty lame argument, it is after all a form of hate speech. Look at what happened to Kramer when he spewed his racist rantings at black patrons. His career is pretty much kaput.
Oh, please, we can hear you say, that’s just one wingnut among a sea of supportive comments. Then, there’s this one:
There is NO excuse for homophobia or ANY hate, racist comments.
Heckling..ANYthing…the hecklers were paying for drinks and the stand-up should be used to being heckled. He blew it and now will pay
Really glad the business is suffering. Karma
Karma, indeed. Canadian karma, to be exact. Canadian comedians should be worried that they are doing their thing in a nation in which Dean Steacy, lead investigator of the Canadian Human Rights Commission said:
Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don’t give it any value.
And then there’s this from “Mr. Mom”:
I don’t have much sympathy for any of those involved. First off, just because you have a microphone and are on a stage doesn’t make you an artist. Sounds like there was very little that could be called art in this verbal and physical exchange. Besides, the guy admits that he was pissed off. He was on the attack. The tirade he let go was uncontrolled anger, not comedic expression and not at all funny.
I don’t appreciate comedy clubs because the comedians are generally unfunny hacks, like this guy. Hate is hate, no matter how you package it, and I don’t think hacks like this guy should have a free pass by claiming (falsely in my view) that they are artists.
Neither should Pardy be awarded anything: she engaged in a form of mutual and consensual verbal jousting that went to mutual physical attacks.
Artistic expression does not excuse discriminatory and hateful language, but this was a mutual combat situation.
We know what you’re saying– It can’t happen here. And you may be right.
The commenter sited above from the CBC site tries to draw a parallel between Guy Earle’s tirade and that of Michael Richards’ infamous Laugh Factory eruption. Sure, his career is (at least for now), “kaput,” but throughout all the hubbub– the grandstanding by media whore Gloria Allred, the ridiculous Larry King interviews and the mea culpas on late night television– never was an arm of the government involved.
The most troubling aspect of this entire mess is that the government is coming down hard on a citizen. Mr. Earle has our sympathies. We can’t imagine what it must be like to have one’s government seeking to curtail our liberty.
Last week, at the tail end of humorist and pundit Mark Steyn’s NRO column on the Ann Coulter/Ottawa University incident, entitled “Bienvenue au Canada,” we saw this:
Translated from the original Canadian, “diversity” means “state-mandated mob-enforced conformity.” As for whether “it works” for Canadians, ask Guy Earle. On Monday Mr Earle, a stand-up comedian of conventionally Trudeaupian views, goes on trial at the British Columbia “Human Rights” Tribunal for putting down two hecklers at his nightclub act. They were, alas for him, of the lesbian persuasion, and so he is now charged with “homophobia.” What a wretched embarrassment to a once free society.
Wretched embarrassment sums it up nicely.
Our posts on Guy Earle are here and here. Pay particular attention to the comments. They’re delicious.
And block out the five or six minutes to check out Rob Breakenridge’s column on Guy Earle. Breakenridge blogs for AM 770 CHQR, a news, talk and sports station in (surprise!) Calgary. Again, pay particular attention to the comments. One comment is signed by “The Vancouver Comedy Community” and it labels Earle a “balls-less dick!!!!!” It’s nice to know they have his back.
Then, there’s this wonderful assessment from Mark A. Roberts:
You make an important point in your story. In regards to ‘Bad Guy’ it is a point that is sorely lacking, as evidenced by his lack of work over the past 3 years…he simply isn’t funny. He wasn’t funny, nor has he the ability to BE funny, unless you have a special tangent for Pathos. Maybe he could land a gig in a nightclub of sadists! Ah, but then he couldn’t be the bully that physically crosses over the boundaries of comedy into assault and battery…like the unimaginative brute that he is. He simply isn’t funny. He is only entertainment for the Media as fodder that generates discussion…like this. ‘Bad Guy’ is not a woman, lesbian nor Jewish. He is a bitter drunk who one time in the past was probably told by another drunk; “You’re funny! You should be a Comedian.” And the poor boy believed it. tsk tsk so sad…
Nice!
3 Responses
Reply to: Canadian comic sells out colleague
B & T, you are way off base in slamming Roy. I sat through the tribunal testimony where these guys were pulled in against their wishes to testify as witnesses. The prosecuter and hearing dude kept hammering for exact words said… what Nick said were pretty close to fact, but his opinion on Earle and the show are exactly that… opinion.
I see little bearing on the outcome, considering Pardy’s facts differed from most witnesses. She’s at least 40% responsible for escalating argument. Also how were her human rights violated when she was allowed to stay until end of night, when any other heckler of disturbance would have been asked to leave in same scenario? In fact she got preferential treatment from establishment who should have tossed her before she had chance to throw water twice.
But for you to any way suggest these comics testified to grandstand or help themself publicly, you are way off base. Nic Roy answered his questions with honesty, not with agenda. It’s not like there was a lawyer around, or Guy Earle even, to organize comics on one side of the case. That’s right… Guy Earle never even showed up to his own tribunal… isn’t even defending freedom of speech that his actions caused to jeopardize. So how can you get mad at Nick Roy for giving his honest opinion of the situation when asked under oath two hours earlier in the day than what he is used to waking up? Do you really think he wanted to be there? You are unfair in your assumptions.
Vintz:
Firstly: You are supposed to stick to the facts. You aren’t supposed to give your opinion. Any real court of law would suggest that Roy keep to the facts and refrain from giving his opinion.
Secondly: We agree that Pardy’s actions work against her.
Thirdly, when you say this:
That’s right… Guy Earle never even showed up to his own tribunal… isn’t even defending freedom of speech that his actions caused to jeopardize.
We must say that you are blaming the victim here. Guy Earle’s “actions” (his speech) cannot, in any way, shape or form, jeopardize freedom of speech. It doesn’t work that way. Once you start to view speech as jeopardizing freedom of speech, you are headed down a very slippery slope. You are playing into the hands of those who would gladly curtail your freedom of speech.
As did Roy– his sunglasses, his demeanor, his willingness to offer his opinion as to Earle’s relative funniness– all of his “performance” played right into the hands of the bureaucrats who seek to curtail speech.
You don’t do your argument any good by suggesting that comedians aren’t capable of rising early when another man’s liberty and property are at stake. You perpetuate moronic stereotypes and you make us wonder just what kind of opinion you hold of Roy in particular and comics in general.
And another thing:
If you’d like us to turn this around– just to make a point– we could easily do so.
We have the utterly bizarre spectacle of Nic Roy, who prides himself on being a comic on the edge (one who has been banned from multiple venues, and therefore possibly in need of even more protection from prosecution than Earle), encountering an opinion that he doesn’t like (ours) who then sends us an email that is– on the surface– homophobic and vaguely threatening.
Were we to be of the same mind as Lorna Pardy or the thuggish bureacrats that run the show in B.C., we might say that Roy is guilty of some sort of international hate crime.
And you, by your comments, and in your zeal to throw Guy Earle under the bus, defend him.
This would make you some sort of accessory.
See where this is going?
If you don’t, you’re a bigger idiot than the vicious troglodyte who heads up the BCHRT.
To sum up: Your desire for a vast, amorphous grey area– where Lorna Pardy is kinda right and kinda wrong and where Guy Earle is wrong and even responsible for his own persecution– is a fertile breeding ground for even more persecution and more curtailment of freedom of speech.
You can’t have it both ways.
Where are all the people defending Guy Earle? Where’s the outrage? What has become of the people in the West who can witness something like this and stay silent?