"This next comic has been seen on YouTube…"
It’s the future. The not-too-distant future. And the internet looks radically different than it did just 12 months earlier. How did that happen? The better question: Why would you expect it to stay the same?
According to Forbes.com, Google made money when they shelled out $1.65 billion for YouTube.
While $1.6 billion may seem like a lot to spend, it really isn’t–not when the deal is all stock. Shares of Google gained $8.50 on news of the deal today, driving the company’s market capitalization up by more than $2 billion. So at least for the day, Google made more than $400 million on this deal.
Sweet!
Our ears stood up when we heard that part of YouTube (GooTube? YouToogle?)’s strategy might now entail micropayments to the content providers. That’s right: You sling your five minutes of comedy up there, promote the hell out of it via one or more of the social networking sites, drive eyeballs to it, and, somewhere down the line, you get a check for $12.27 signed by Sergei Brin and Larry Page. It’s only right. In the future, we’re all television producers.
Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban said earlier this month that anyone who would consider buying YouTube is “a moron.” The usually forward-thinking Cuban justified his harsh assessment by saying that any such purchaser would be trapped in a thicket of legal troubles, as so much of what is now up on the popular video sharing site is neither copyrighted nor posted by the legal owner. We’re fairly certain, however, that Brin and Page have thought this all through.
For a mind-boggling exercise, check out that Forbes.com article– it is a snapshot of the current WWW landscape. It is a lot like the starting gate at a high-stakes horse race. A handful of mind-bending technologies and business models are all poised, waiting for the bell– a short and furious sprint, over almost before it begins, will sort out the winners and losers. And in 18 months or so, the Wall Street Journal, Entertainment Tonight and Wired will break it down and we’ll witness yet another re-arrangement of the entertainment industry that no one could have imagined. Nobody will get excited about “paradigm shifts” any more, as they will be coming on a quarterly basis.
Mash all those websites and techno doo-dads together, add several billion dollars in capital, shake well using a broadband connection and what comes out is dozens (hundreds?) of miniature television networks. They look the same as the old ones, but the content is provided by the viewers. If you’re still not getting it, check out this article from the August 2005 Wired.
In the meantime, YouTube is a smashing way for comedians to display their wares, to “send out a videotape,” five or six minutes at a time. Pretty soon, we won’t need to assemble a press kit or visit the post office. Not soon enough, we say.
No Responses
Reply to: "This next comic has been seen on YouTube…"
You know, I don’t know what I really think about You Tube and Myspace with regard to comedy. It kinda scares me actually. I know one thing though. Nothing can replace the magic of a live performance, whether you’re on the stage or watching your favorite comic from the audience.You Tube- $1.65 BillionHaving seen Hedberg live- Priceless
Re-read the posting– we do not say that we think YouTube will/can replace “the magic of live performance.” In fact, we imply quite the opposite. (The title of the post was an introduction from an emcee, citing one of the comic’s credits as being seen on YouTube, implying that YouTube will become much like other electronic media.)YouTube should not scare you. We’re not sure why you’re scared. In fact, we point out in the post that YouTube is going to start paying the content providers for providing content (and we implied that the era of folks providing content that isn’t rightfully theirs is over). Mind you, we didn’t say that providing content to YouTube would be lucrative (we deliberately set the figure on the imaginary check at $12.27, you’ll notice), but we were implying that at least the lawlessness that currently prevails will be gone.No one appreciates the magic of live performance more than us here. YouTube, if used skillfully by the performers, can drive more people to those live venues. It’s never been easier, cheaper and more efficient for a comic to “advertise” himself– to the ticket-buying public or to the industry– and some other benefits are yet to be seen.
I agree with with you. The era of You Tube and viral marketing and social networking can certainly help comedy and comedians and all performers. As a means of promotion it will likely prove a boon to people who might not have had the means to promote themselves. I suppose the fear I spoke of is that it would in some way replace live comedy or prevent people from attending shows when they could download an entire performance from the web. I wasn’t really trying to say that the You Tube phenomenon is a bad thing. I think I was high on 16 ounces of dark roast Sumatra coffee when I wrote that.Another related issue that keeps coming up amongst my fellow comics and I is the issue of putting material out there so publicly. Some people clearly do not want to put up material for fear of theft. Others think it’s nonsense and that it’s necessary to promote oneself. It seems that a couple of minutes of material might be worth putting up. But still, someone could surely steal them. I’m curious how you feel about this. Could You Tube become Hack Tube?