All hail our new comedy leader!!
An article in the Connecticut Post relates the story of a local Stratford, CT, boy, attending GWU, who has earned a spot in a comedy contest being conducted by an online standup comedy clip aggregator.
Travis Helwig doesn’t like jokes. He finds them pedestrian, quaint and often anticlimactic. That’s a little strange, because Helwig, 20, of Stratford, has been interested in performing comedy for much of his life.[…]
Helwig made his school’s standup team, even though he’s not a big fan of the format. That’s because he finds conventional standup– and jokes in general– a bit dull.
“There’s a set-up and a punchline and you know what’s going to happen and it’s never as satisfying as you’d hoped,” he said.
Instead of taking the stage and rattling off one-liners, he developed an act more akin to performance art, adopting the persona of an awkward man terrified to be onstage.
An awkward man, you say?!? Terrified to be onstage?!?
Why… in all the history of standup comedy we can say without hesitation– with absolute certainty– that this has never been done before!
I suggest that we all have a meeting and try to determine if there any– ANY!– reason why any of us– all of us, each and every one of us currently doing standup comedy– should remain in the business of standup! So ingenious, so perfect, so positively unique and exquisitely wonderful is this Helwig’s concept that it would be folly for any of us to continue.
All hail, Travis Helwig! He is our new Comedy Leader! Before him, we are but greasy pieces of dust, unoriginal and slovenly, not worthy of inclusion in the category that includes him!
It is indeed a shattering experience to realize that all of one’s efforts have heretofore been but piddling and pathetic attempts– mere precursors to that which is the splendor of Travis Helwig. But we shall console ourselves with the fact that we will no longer embarrass ourselves with our pedestrian bleating. And we will forever take delight in his actions. (Click on the story to behold his clip.)
But, seriously, folks: Our tiny friend displays that painful combination of hubris and jaw-dropping ignorance. What’s the old saying? If you wanna break the rules, you gotta know the rules. And, if you’re going to pass yourself off as The New Comedy Messiah, you had better come up with something better than “awkward man terrified to be onstage,” something that has been done (and, in nearly all instances, abandonded quickly) by countless open-mikers since the dawn of (funny) man.
It’s disrespectful. It’s embarrassing. And the reporter ate it up.
12 Responses
Reply to: All hail our new comedy leader!!
I have to say I’ve been really disappointed in the really bitter, dismissive way SheckyMagazine has been covering profiles of individual comedians in the press lately, particularly of the greener comics. Surely it’s not their fault some joker at their local paper had nothing better to cover, and I would dare say that a lot of these comedians are being misquoted slightly or perhaps not really thinking about what they’re saying to the press. Isn’t there other comedy news to cover other than wannabe journalists writing about wannabe comics? It’s getting tired.
I agree with Ryan. This incredibly sarcastic coverage of stand-up coverage is getting really tiresome.
We’ve been “bitter” and “dismissive” since 1999, yet USAToday called us “charming, sincere and helpful!”Go figure.What you call “tiresome,” we call a trend. We didn’t create it, we’re merely commenting on it. It’s out there, whether we comment on it or not. Some comedians (inexperienced and otherwise) have been saying dumbass things and some news outfits have been, more or less, accurately reporting those things.Don’t blame us.If you want to read a website that merely re-writes cheery press releases, there are plenty out there, we suppose.Good luck!
While I think the kid is probably a victim of a cheesy local newspaper writer more than anything else, what in the HELL is a “standup team?”
Timmy Mac:I believe that “comedy team” is a reference to the three or four contestants chosen from GWU.
“We’ve been “bitter” and “dismissive” since 1999, yet USAToday called us “charming, sincere and helpful!””Precisely my point; what happened?While I would agree that an unfavorable trend has surfaced in the media regarding foot-in-mouth comedians, I’m just disappointed that SheckyMagazine has decided to latch onto it with such negative fervor, giving off almost a jealous tinge (which I know is not the case, but that is, arguably, how it appears). I love Shecky and guess I just expected better, so all I’m really saying is: “Back off a little, will ya?”
Picking on a green comedian in his twenties is, well, just a little too easy. It was probably his first interview and since he is still in school has had an opportunity to meet maybe 0.1% of the stand-up community at large. If he sticks to it he will probably be more embarrassed by his naivety 10 years down the road than anyone hoping that they will not be able to pull up this article in an archive.Moreover, who at twenty does not think that they are going to light the world on fire? The only trend that you’ve spotted is that young adults can be a bit obtuse and my grandfather had that one down over 30 years ago. This publication gets very emotional when stand-up comics are seen as bitter, emotionally unstable people, and this is why the tone of this contribution is puzzling. It just kind of works against the brand that was being built.As for the New York Times that was then. Maybe someone did not have their morning java fix today.
oh god…thank you Shecky…thank you so much for putting that cocky fucker Travis Helwig in his place. Who isn’t tired of this arrogant dick making a big deal of himself, claiming over and over that his stage persona is something new and brilliant. I mean i was threatened by this guy. It’s blogs like yours that have that combo of insight and balls to go after dangerous people like Travis. you know which fights are worthwhile. keep on fighting.Although, this post would be somewhat of an embarrassment if Helwig was just a young upstart still trying to find his voice, or if the post just made points we all know already, but with satire/sarcasm at a 16 year old level (i thought mine was pretty good!), then this would be kinda laughable. At least it’s not a post like that.
Considering this post is about me, I might as well say something.I actually read this web site occasionally, which is why I was a bit surprised when I saw my name on here. While I want to respond to a lot, I’ll be careful to not display “that painful combination of hubris and jaw-dropping ignorance” that seems to ooze from that story in the Connecticut Post.First off, I apologize if my comments seemed to belittle something you are all passionate about. I’m equally passionate about comedy, just in a different form. I’m an improviser, and I told her that. When she asked why I liked improv more than stand up, I gave her the reasons. I didn’t answer the phone and immediately start ranting about the state of comedy. I didn’t want the interview to my manifesto, however I did answer the questions she asked of me.I explained to her how I compensated by trying different things out. This includes the current incarnation of someone who is really lonely and uncomfortable in his life. I also pointed out that my character was mainly ripped off from my love of Andy Kaufman, Neil Hamburger, Jon Benjiman and Tim&Eric. She decided to not print my citation.I was approached by my hometown newspaper to do an interview. It’s that simple. Did she misquote me? No. Did she leave things out? Yes.I never called jokes quaint or pedestrian or even dull. I said it wasn’t my thing. I said I was much more satisfied by trying to make people not laugh, which usually leads to people laughing. I also told her this isn’t a new concept.I did not condemn stand up comedy or claim to be a maverick in the gray world of humor. I said it wasn’t my thing. It’s not something I enjoy, as much as I enjoy improv. Why was I worthy of an article? I have no idea. But she contacted me, and I said yes.I can see how this article painted me as a bit of an asshole, but that wasn’t my intention. Do I think it warranted ridicule on a website I respect? Probably not. However, what’s done is done, and I realize now that it might have pissed some people off. And to that, I’m sorry.I take comedy very seriously, and I understand how this could have been construed as an attack on your form of it.I run a blog on my campus, and I recently got into some hot-water with a couple of people over something I had written. I had forgotten that the words I type are read by a lot of people, and that the things I say actually do mean something. Perhaps, the assumption was made that I wasn’t well versed in the comedic circuit online, or that I would never stumble upon your post. Perhaps you didn’t care. Either way, I read what you wrote. And I’m not going to say it hurt, but it didn’t feel great. Comedy is terrifying enough and to be condemned by a respectable publication because of my first interview is, well, quite discouraging.And you were right. I did stand up at the DC Improv last night and I’ve already abandoned the nervous guy.Your New Comedy Messiah,Travis Helwig
Thanks, Travis.That couldn’t have been an easy letter to write!See you in D.C. some day!Perhaps some day you’ll come to appreciate standup as much as you do improv.Thanks again.And check in more often!
P.S.You missed an opportunity to promote your blog. What is the URL?
Thanks for the quick response.Well, my blog is mainly oriented around GW’s campus, so it’s not really macro-promotable. However, here’s a link: TheColonialist.com.I also have a link to my performance in the regional competition. It was one of my worst performances, character wise, but I figure you might want to see it.http://www.rooftopcomedy.com//events/college/watch/TravisHelwigGWUTheComedySpotRegional